jiminaus
Apr 12, 03:47 AM
You're forming a URL, so the URL needs be properly encoded. For example, a space needs to be encoded as %20. But don't do this manually, use NSString's stringByAddingPercentEscapesUsingEncoding:
psyduckiee
Apr 13, 12:47 PM
Your Lucky sides will have to be taken off because the added width, it won't even fit and close with the case on. Depending on your combo of front and back shields will determine if it's a fit. As for your combo, it should fit in but will be a little snug. The built-in shield from the Defender will raise slightly above the iPhone screen because of the snug fit with the front shield on. You will notice a slight lack of sensitivity because the built-in screen protector is not directly touching the glass but instead, due to the tight fit with the front shield, there is a slight gap between the built-in shield and your PS shield.
Bloodstar
Apr 30, 05:36 AM
You can use your MacBook's HD, just not as an internal... only an external.
If you have a proper enclosure (Remember, MacBook HDs are SATA, iBooks are IDE!) you can use it over USB or FireWire.
As for RAM, though, you're out of luck. Gotta grab up a 1GB stick of DDR, which is unfortunately expensive. A 512 would also help, in a pinch.
If you have a proper enclosure (Remember, MacBook HDs are SATA, iBooks are IDE!) you can use it over USB or FireWire.
As for RAM, though, you're out of luck. Gotta grab up a 1GB stick of DDR, which is unfortunately expensive. A 512 would also help, in a pinch.
Father Jack
Jan 16, 02:29 PM
IWhat if they were all glossy? What a nightmare that would be.
I don't think you need to worry about that. Serious image editors would never use a glossy screen.
I don't think you need to worry about that. Serious image editors would never use a glossy screen.
DJDylz
May 5, 07:54 PM
Sorry but I don't really understand your reply. I think I get what your getting at.
I will give an example. Joe Smith.
Just say his email is jsmith@blah.com
first time i receive an email from him, i right click his email address at the top of the email and go down to add to address book.
Then I test it by opening a new email, clicking in the TO: section and typing 'Joe'.. It wont find it but if i type 'js' it will find it.
Next I have tried deleting that contact from the address book and opening address book myself. Adding the contact physically through the address book program. Test it, same thing. Only way I can search a name in an email is to open a new email click the address book icon within that email pane and find the user. Which is just another extra step I should have to do. :(
I will give an example. Joe Smith.
Just say his email is jsmith@blah.com
first time i receive an email from him, i right click his email address at the top of the email and go down to add to address book.
Then I test it by opening a new email, clicking in the TO: section and typing 'Joe'.. It wont find it but if i type 'js' it will find it.
Next I have tried deleting that contact from the address book and opening address book myself. Adding the contact physically through the address book program. Test it, same thing. Only way I can search a name in an email is to open a new email click the address book icon within that email pane and find the user. Which is just another extra step I should have to do. :(
Cromulent
Jan 28, 05:34 PM
Also it should be noted that launchd is preferred over cron on Mac OS X.
kcdude
May 1, 08:28 PM
S
840quadra
Nov 2, 12:23 AM
All that needs to be done is to have the Macs that are not part of the "original" all-in-one series (128k, 512k, Plus, etc.) moved up in the heirarchy so we have
68k Desktops
With the following sub categories:
%IMG_DESC_9%
%IMG_DESC_10%
%IMG_DESC_11%
%IMG_DESC_12%
%IMG_DESC_13%
%IMG_DESC_14%
%IMG_DESC_15%
%IMG_DESC_16%
%IMG_DESC_17%
%IMG_DESC_18%
%IMG_DESC_19%
68k Desktops
With the following sub categories:
kainjow
Apr 30, 12:17 AM
I'm guessing what's happening is since your window is an NSPanel it is not registered as a main window, so after the About box closes, it doesn't have a main window anymore and terminates. You could try subclassing NSPanel and overriding canBecomeMainWindow and return YES, then use this subclass in your nib.
decksnap
Oct 25, 07:55 AM
Do me a favor. If you don't already have it turned on, turn on Dock magnification and move your mouse pointer slowly across the icons. See how they scale smoothly, and yet don't look like crap? Those icons are 256x256 bitmaps. Its all about doing things properly.
But see, these images are never being scaled up beyond their original size- they are being scaled DOWN. That is the difference. We are talking about scaling things UP. Have you ever had an old OS 9 icon in your dock? When you magnify it, it looks like crap.
Understand that web designers tend to manage graphics pixel by pixel. Once you start stretching pixels in images across pixels on the screen, everything goes to crap. All you've got to do to see this is turn on your zoom feature.
But see, these images are never being scaled up beyond their original size- they are being scaled DOWN. That is the difference. We are talking about scaling things UP. Have you ever had an old OS 9 icon in your dock? When you magnify it, it looks like crap.
Understand that web designers tend to manage graphics pixel by pixel. Once you start stretching pixels in images across pixels on the screen, everything goes to crap. All you've got to do to see this is turn on your zoom feature.
bella92108
Mar 31, 12:38 PM
Could be wrong but apple have the iPhone, iPod, iPad vs android os which is in basically every new manufacture phone, motorola, htc, samsung, lg, etc... each having at least 5 phones with the os....only thing those number proves is that there's a Lot of android os out there............and most people use them because of the price...doesnt tmobile have some free android phones they give out when you sign up with a new contract....? In conclusion everybody and their mothers put android os in their newly made phones/tablet vs apples few iOS line.....
Huh? They're successful because there's so many of them? That's the strangest argument... Toyota sells more cars than any other manufacturer because they have more cars and more customers to buy them? The only thing that comes to mind is "DUHHH!" lol... the reason all the manufacturers are coming out with Android phones is because people are loving them, and it's the "latest and greatest" and has staying power. It's THE OS going forward, even if iPhone and iOS come out with a new phone in their one-a-year game, it's too late to stop Android's dominance of the market.
Price? Have you even shopped the market lately? Android phones are the exact same price specs to specs as i Phone. To buy a motorola Atrix, Evo 4G, or Inspire 4G, the latest "comparable" (used loosely because you can do a lot more on them) phones to a 16GB iPhone you're looking at $150-250 with a contract, just like iPhone.
Sure, you can get phones with less features for cheaper (not sure about free, maybe)... and can buy them on prepaid, etc.... but that's because the OS is an open OS, so it's not "you have one option, take or leave it" ... they actually give customers a choice, like what would have saved Apple from losing their grip on the #1 spot years ago.
Android really has given users what they asked Apple for for years in a phone, and it paid off. Now they're looking to give tablet users CHOICE and features, something Apple still is uninterested in, so the game will play out the same. I love Apple (long time iMac\MacBook Air\iPad user)... but I won't sit around and be a fanboy like the people on here, while there are cool options that don't require me to use a half-ass device while awaiting jailbreak.
Huh? They're successful because there's so many of them? That's the strangest argument... Toyota sells more cars than any other manufacturer because they have more cars and more customers to buy them? The only thing that comes to mind is "DUHHH!" lol... the reason all the manufacturers are coming out with Android phones is because people are loving them, and it's the "latest and greatest" and has staying power. It's THE OS going forward, even if iPhone and iOS come out with a new phone in their one-a-year game, it's too late to stop Android's dominance of the market.
Price? Have you even shopped the market lately? Android phones are the exact same price specs to specs as i Phone. To buy a motorola Atrix, Evo 4G, or Inspire 4G, the latest "comparable" (used loosely because you can do a lot more on them) phones to a 16GB iPhone you're looking at $150-250 with a contract, just like iPhone.
Sure, you can get phones with less features for cheaper (not sure about free, maybe)... and can buy them on prepaid, etc.... but that's because the OS is an open OS, so it's not "you have one option, take or leave it" ... they actually give customers a choice, like what would have saved Apple from losing their grip on the #1 spot years ago.
Android really has given users what they asked Apple for for years in a phone, and it paid off. Now they're looking to give tablet users CHOICE and features, something Apple still is uninterested in, so the game will play out the same. I love Apple (long time iMac\MacBook Air\iPad user)... but I won't sit around and be a fanboy like the people on here, while there are cool options that don't require me to use a half-ass device while awaiting jailbreak.
polishmacuser
Apr 14, 12:57 AM
just ridiculous with AT&T, i bought my unlock and im waiting from CutYourSim, i would rather have an official unlock and not jailbreak. I paid for my phone and i have a right to do with it as I please. Traveling over the years having two phones, one being crappy and one being awesome but no useable sucks.
Jailbreaking is not the proper option or even accessible for certain iPhones at certain firmwares. I say pay the unlock for 169 bucks instead of being called owing 1,000 dollars for roaming charges.
What I'm wondering is that how long will this fiasco go for? Will apple shutdown this or will AT&T?
Jailbreaking is not the proper option or even accessible for certain iPhones at certain firmwares. I say pay the unlock for 169 bucks instead of being called owing 1,000 dollars for roaming charges.
What I'm wondering is that how long will this fiasco go for? Will apple shutdown this or will AT&T?
MarcelV
Oct 8, 08:31 AM
What, $0.99 a call everytime? ;)
Only if you pre-order the call or in the week you had scheduled to do the call. After that, it will go up to $14.99...... :D
Only if you pre-order the call or in the week you had scheduled to do the call. After that, it will go up to $14.99...... :D
whooleytoo
Apr 15, 10:36 AM
Bad in that the stuff that is encouraging people to move over is the angry bird type games and that it appears to make the more in depth stuff isn't as profitable. So in the long run we may not see as many games come out that are profitable.
Well, when you have people complaining about the price of 2 euro games, then you know the market is just a rush to the bottom. Simple games that can be quickly and cheaply made; with very little depth. I prefer longer, more involved gameplay too, but who's going to make those games with the price point so low?
Already it is sad when you look at the console market a lot of games are just games based on popular movies and not much innovation (cause the games based on the movies make the money and stuff like Okami and more innovative stuff gets ignored). I remember when I was reading an article complaining about how that was the trend in games (it happened to movies too once blockbusters came out. Movie studios were more interested in making blockbusters than unique movies, basically finding a formula that worked and sticking with it rather than trying anything different).
I agree, it's the same thing. If you want to make a big game (or movie), you need lots of money. That means you need an investor - whose motivation is making a profit. To make a profit you then have to sell a lot of copies, so the game has to be mainstream. It has to be low-risk, so will stick to conventional, proven game-types. Great for investors, boring and predictable for gamers.
Well, when you have people complaining about the price of 2 euro games, then you know the market is just a rush to the bottom. Simple games that can be quickly and cheaply made; with very little depth. I prefer longer, more involved gameplay too, but who's going to make those games with the price point so low?
Already it is sad when you look at the console market a lot of games are just games based on popular movies and not much innovation (cause the games based on the movies make the money and stuff like Okami and more innovative stuff gets ignored). I remember when I was reading an article complaining about how that was the trend in games (it happened to movies too once blockbusters came out. Movie studios were more interested in making blockbusters than unique movies, basically finding a formula that worked and sticking with it rather than trying anything different).
I agree, it's the same thing. If you want to make a big game (or movie), you need lots of money. That means you need an investor - whose motivation is making a profit. To make a profit you then have to sell a lot of copies, so the game has to be mainstream. It has to be low-risk, so will stick to conventional, proven game-types. Great for investors, boring and predictable for gamers.
juicedropsdeuce
Apr 20, 06:29 PM
people will pay good money for good sh**! I do. My jcrew giant fit chinos cost $65.00 a pair now. Up from $59.50. But they are well made with an awesome fit. Same for my new balance 1223s. ...
lmfao
lmfao
-DH
Apr 19, 02:44 PM
Regardless of the mic's quality, being that it is on-camera would mean that only the sounds very close to the camera would be picked up well.
On-camera mics are notorious for overall poor sound recording. If you want good quality audio recording, you'd need to mic the sound source(s) properly and with the right type of mic(s).
-DH
On-camera mics are notorious for overall poor sound recording. If you want good quality audio recording, you'd need to mic the sound source(s) properly and with the right type of mic(s).
-DH
Michaelgtrusa
Nov 6, 11:36 PM
Here. http://www.flickr.com/photos/michaelthegeek/5089944661/
ucfgrad93
Mar 29, 05:55 PM
Sorry OP, but I don't believe this.
WhatAmI
Apr 29, 01:30 AM
nvm i just read that. does anybody have one i can download? thanks
I think linking to them here would break site rules, you need to Google for it.
I think linking to them here would break site rules, you need to Google for it.
CorvetteZR1
May 3, 09:36 PM
That should work fine. All you're doing is copying the music files onto the USB and then on to the other computer, right?
Right. My friend said there would be a problem with duplicates though. Not sure if he knows what he's talking about or not?
Right. My friend said there would be a problem with duplicates though. Not sure if he knows what he's talking about or not?
AvSRoCkCO1067
Mar 18, 09:36 PM
Nobody knows. We will likely know when Steve plans next years Macworld. If it is at SF, there is a good chance it will always be at SF.
Next year's MacWorld is already set. It's a week later than this year's - but it's in the same place (Moscone West, SF).
Next year's MacWorld is already set. It's a week later than this year's - but it's in the same place (Moscone West, SF).
tigress666
Apr 15, 12:24 PM
As far as Nintendo porting, that would be a horrible decision for them. They might as well sell themselves to Sega. Nintendo's situation is worsened by the 3DS kind of missing the point and they don't need to make it even worse by losing their exclusives. (Personally, the 3DS completely lost me. I bought the original DS and DS lite but I see no reason to get a 3DS because they just tacked optional 3D on). Sony's NGP might interest me if they ever get their store/update junk sorted out. They seem to have ADHD.
I have to agree here.
Until they find games that the 3D is actually part of game play (it is essential to the actual game and not just add on prettyness), it's just a nice extra but it's a gimmick and not enough to actually sell it over other devices. ANd I really don't see how 3d, at least how it is implemented in the Nintendo, can really be implemented to be part of game play and not just something to pretty up the screen. Sure, it adds to the experience, but it's not essential to the experience. You could play a similar game on another game player easily enough, just not as "pretty".
Any console/hand held in the end, if it is going to sell itself for playing games, has to get the games that make people want it to play them.
I have to agree here.
Until they find games that the 3D is actually part of game play (it is essential to the actual game and not just add on prettyness), it's just a nice extra but it's a gimmick and not enough to actually sell it over other devices. ANd I really don't see how 3d, at least how it is implemented in the Nintendo, can really be implemented to be part of game play and not just something to pretty up the screen. Sure, it adds to the experience, but it's not essential to the experience. You could play a similar game on another game player easily enough, just not as "pretty".
Any console/hand held in the end, if it is going to sell itself for playing games, has to get the games that make people want it to play them.
ctt1wbw
Nov 5, 09:28 PM
I think you're right - check the bow.
;)
I'm laying money on the USS Missouri (BB-11) before the cage masts were fitted.
No, that pic is way pre WW2. That's around WW1 by the looks of it.
;)
I'm laying money on the USS Missouri (BB-11) before the cage masts were fitted.
No, that pic is way pre WW2. That's around WW1 by the looks of it.
magid
Dec 19, 05:06 PM
They should be to you either today or tomorrow, ive been busy lately and it took me a few days to get them out.